cepaos
Start free
← Blog
Blog·7 min read·Cepaos

EU Wine E-Label Rules: What Goes on the Bottle vs the QR Code

Ingredients, nutrition and allergens: what the EU e-label regulation actually requires on the label versus the QR code, and the mistake that gets wine pulled from shelves.

On 8 December 2023, the bottle of wine changed. Not the liquid inside it, but the story it is legally required to tell. From that day, every wine placed on the European Union market had to carry a full list of ingredients and a nutrition declaration. After decades as the one grocery aisle exempt from the rules that govern a tin of beans, wine joined everyone else.

The lever was Regulation (EU) 2021/2117, which amended the Common Market Organisation (CMO) framework. Its quiet innovation was permission rather than prohibition: producers may push the heavy detail onto a screen instead of a back label, through an electronic means, typically a QR code, that the trade now calls the e-label.

8 Dec 2023
Rules entered application
Harvest 2024+
Wines fully in scope

Whether you run a small estate in Bordeaux, a cooperative in Tuscany, or an Argentine bodega shipping to Germany, the point of sale inside the EU treats you the same.

What the regulation actually requires

Before 2021/2117, wine sat in a comfortable exception. A label carried alcohol, volume, origin, and the allergen most people never read about (sulfites). Calories and a substance-by-substance breakdown were nobody's business but the cellar master's.

That comfort is gone. Two new mandatory particulars now apply.

A nutrition declaration: energy value, fat, saturates, carbohydrates, sugars, protein, and salt, expressed per 100 ml in line with the food information rules of Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011. These figures describe the wine in that bottle, not a tidy regional average.

A list of ingredients: headed by the word "Ingredients," opening with the grapes, and naming the substances used in production that the rules require to be declared. Think sulfur dioxide, acidity regulators such as tartaric acid, sweetening additions, and the rest of the winemaker's toolkit.

Allergens keep their old, stricter home. Sulfites and any other allergenic substances must appear on the physical label itself, introduced by the word "Contains," and that obligation does not move to a screen.

How the e-label works

Here is the trade-off the regulation offers. The full ingredient list and the full nutrition declaration may live electronically, behind a QR code, instead of on paper. What stays printed on the bottle is the energy value (which may be shown with the symbol "E") and the allergen declaration.

So a compliant back label can be almost spartan: a calorie figure, "Contains: sulfites," and a code to scan.

The screen, though, is not a marketing surface. The regulation is explicit that the electronic ingredient list and nutrition declaration must not sit alongside information meant for sales or marketing, and that no user data may be collected or tracked. No analytics. No cookies harvesting scans. The word "Ingredients" has to be plainly identifiable so a shopper does not confuse it with a promotional page.

The QR code is allowed to inform. It is not allowed to sell, and it is not allowed to watch.

In practice the page should also load without forcing an app or a sign-up, show up in a language the local consumer understands, and stay live for as long as the wine is on shelves. A dead link is a missing label.

Who is actually caught by this

The cleanest way the Commission frames the scope: the new rules apply to wines produced from the 2024 harvest onward, and more broadly to wine placed on the EU market from 8 December 2023. That sweeps in EU producers selling at home or across member states, non-EU producers exporting in, and bulk wine bottled inside the Union.

There is one genuine escape hatch, and it is narrower than people hope. Wine produced in the EU before 8 December 2023, or imported before that date, may keep being sold under the old labels until those stocks run out. The exemption attaches to production and import, not to when you happened to print the label.

If you sell into the EU from outside it, the regulator is rarely your first problem. Your importer is. Many have already written e-label compliance into their purchase orders, because a non-compliant pallet is their liability at customs and on the shelf, not just yours.

What data you actually need to prepare

The information itself is not exotic. The trouble is that it lives in two different places that rarely talk to each other.

For each wine (each SKU with its own label) you need four things:

  1. A nutritional analysis, per 100 ml, for energy and the rest of the declaration. That comes from the lab.
  2. A defensible ingredient list, traceable to what actually went into the lot. That comes from the cellar book.
  3. Allergen identification, so sulfites and any other allergenic substances are flagged for the printed label.
  4. The right languages, so a buyer in each market can read the page.

Picture the usual setup. The winemaking history sits in a paper notebook or a half-remembered spreadsheet. The lab results arrive as a PDF in an inbox. Once a year, someone stitches them together by hand for every cuvee. That is exactly the process where an ingredient gets dropped, or one you never used gets copied across from last vintage. The regulation does not forgive a clerical slip; the e-label is a legal statement.

How Cepaos fits in

This is the gap Cepaos was built to close. The cellar book records every operation against a lot, grape reception, additions, treatments, fining, blending, bottling, with quantities and dates. When it comes time to publish an e-label, the ingredient list is read back from that production history, the nutrition figures link from the lab records, and allergens surface from the fining agents and additives actually used. Pages render per target market, a QR code is produced per SKU for your printer, and the e-label URL stays stable across vintages so you update the data without reprinting the code.

The point is not the automation for its own sake. It is that you stop hand-copying a legal declaration once a year.

A short checklist before your next bottling

  1. Audit your labels. Which SKUs already carry the energy value, the allergen line, and a working code? Which do not?
  2. Join your cellar book to your lab data. The e-label needs both, and the join is where errors hide.
  3. Build one page per distinct wine. Each SKU is its own declaration.
  4. Scan your own QR code from a phone. Confirm it loads, reads cleanly, and shows the right language. A broken link is a non-compliant bottle.
  5. Send the URLs to your importer before the wine ships, so compliance is settled on paper, not at customs.

The cutoff is years behind us now. The quiet cost of waiting is that vintages pile up without clean data behind them, and each one is harder to reconstruct than the last. The honest first move is not buying software; it is connecting the two records you already keep.

Start your free 14-day trial, no credit card required

Cepaos: If you'd like to try Cepaos through the founding members program, review the eligibility requirements.

Sources

Get winery management tips and news

Try Cepaos free

Digital winery management with end-to-end traceability. No credit card required.

Start free trial
EU Wine E-Label Rules: What Goes on the Bottle vs the QR Code | Cepaos